Well, that’s what I was going to write anyway: a face off review of both products. I’ve been using both for around the same time since May this year and it seemed to make sense to do a comparison. Having realized that there are probably dozens of similar reviews I thought I would just make some comments on both, but without a particular logical path.
Microsoft seems to be slightly war-weary these days. It seems that the criticisms of Vista are mounting, but the difference this time around is that the origin of the commentary is more business-oriented and more likely to make a dent in the normally po-faced Steve Ballmer. It wasn’t too long ago that he was seen yelling, “Vista… yeah!” at the Microsoft launch party. Although some people have noted that every Windows product has suffered teething-pains in the past, I don’t believe that to be true. Vista was released with the same fanfare as XP, and as I recall there were only initial quibblings surrounding XP’s hardware compatibility. That soon went away and XP has grown to be one of the most sturdy Windows OS’s in history. Windows 95, probably the most hyped operating system of all time, was not without its problems, but it too wasn’t quite as bad as Vista is turning out to be. Only the much-hated Windows ME ever had this many problems, the worst being that it simply didn’t work! Microsoft have announced that Service Pack 1 will be with us in the early part of 2008, and frankly that day won’t come soon enough.
So what’s my overall impression of Vista (in my case, Vista Business)? It’s probably similar to what you’ve already read: nice new eye candy, some changes in the way things are laid out (some of which make sense, others not so much), and… ahem… not much else. I used the search function exactly one time (actually four times in quick succession) and still couldn’t find the file I was looking for. I eventually used an Ubuntu terminal (read: CLI) to locate a mirror of the file on the server. No muss, no fuss.
There are also issues with stability. Explorer, the API that drives the desktop and all the windows, will crash when it feels like it. There’s no rhyme or reason as to when or why it crashes. All of the program icons in the Taskbar get mashed on top of one another, and things will randomly flicker, all the while the clock either freezes of disappears completely. I’m sure I could use more memory but this is the least stable Explorer I’ve seen to date. Windows 2000 had some issues when using Web pages or JPG images as wallpaper, but the problem was easy to identify and resolve.
Almost every time I open an application, the window will appear and I’m immediately treated to an apparent ‘wait time’ whereupon clicking anywhere renders a “(Not responding)” message in the title bar. This happens worst with Photoshop CS2, but then that’s to be expected. CS2 and Vista have an ongoing war of wills. Photoshop refuses to use Aero’s color scheme, or maybe Vista is with-holding that for some reason.
As for Aero itself, it has that nice 3-dimensional rendering of all open applications. I never use it myself. I’m a die-hard Alt-Tabber myself. They’ll take that functionality out of my cold, dead hands… or possibly with SP1.
So, let me wrap up with a quick overview of the beast that is Ubuntu. For those who are not aware, Ubuntu is a flavor of Linux that is built around the Debian ‘distro’. It’s been hailed as the most user-friendly Linux, and it is a snap to install. You can even try it out first using the Live CD, which I did.
Installing Ubuntu was as easy as installing Windows so potentially anyone can have a go. The desktop version uses, by default, the Gnome desktop manager, which I’ve been using since RedHat 9, but there is a KDE version (”Kubuntu”) available also. Once I had the desktop version installed, I began getting all my favorite goodies, such as Apache, PHP and MySQL, and then other important stuff, such as SSH and Samba. This was all achieved using the apt-get package manager at the command line interface. Basically, it was all too easy and it was up and running everything I needed within a couple of hours.
The only hitch I’ve encountered was when I upgraded to the latest version and was met at reboot with a blank screen and not much else. The only solution at that point was a full fresh install of the new version, but once again I had it all back to normal (only better) by the end of the night. Using Red Hat 9, that would have taken a good 2-3 days to achieve, plus a lot more reading of man pages and various Web sites.
My conclusion at the end of the day is probably: Vista — bad, Ubuntu — good.


